Free Tool

Which AI model should
you actually use?

A plain-English side-by-side of Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V3 — context windows, pricing, benchmark scores, and the tasks each one excels at.

Updated March 2026
ℹ️
Note: AI models update frequently. Pricing and benchmarks reflect data available as of March 2026. Context windows and prices may have changed — always verify on the provider's official pricing page before committing to a production integration.
🦩
Claude
Sonnet 4.5 / Opus 4
Best for nuanced writing, long-context analysis, and coding with thorough explanations.
Anthropic
🤖
GPT-4o
GPT-4o / o3
Strongest multimodal model. Best for vision tasks, reasoning chains, and tool use.
OpenAI
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2.5 Pro / Flash
Massive context window (2M tokens). Excellent for document analysis and summarization.
Google
🔍
DeepSeek V3
V3 / R1
Best price-to-performance ratio. Exceptional for coding and reasoning at scale.
DeepSeek
Show: All specs Pricing Context Benchmarks Use Cases
Spec 🦩 Claude 🤖 GPT-4o ♊ Gemini 2.5 Pro 🔍 DeepSeek V3
💰 Pricing (API)
Input price (per 1M tokens) $3 (Sonnet) · $15 (Opus) $2.50 (4o) · $10 (o3) $1.25 (Flash) · $7 (Pro) 🏆 Best value
$0.27 (V3)
Output price (per 1M tokens) $15 (Sonnet) · $75 (Opus) $10 (4o) · $40 (o3) $3.50 (Flash) · $21 (Pro) 🏆 Best value
$1.10 (V3)
Free tier available Claude.ai (rate limited) ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 / limited GPT-4o) AI Studio (generous) ✓ API trial credits
📄 Context Window
Max context (input) 200K tokens 128K tokens 🏆 Largest
2,000K tokens
64K tokens
Best for long docs ✓ Strong Moderate 🏆 Best Limited
📊 Benchmark Scores
MMLU (knowledge)
88.0
90.0
90.0
87.1
HumanEval (coding)
92.0
90.2
86.1
91.0
MATH (math reasoning)
71.1
74.6
91.0
90.2
Multimodal / Vision ✓ Good 🏆 Best 🏆 Excellent ⚠ Text-only (V3)
🎯 Best Use Cases
Long-form writing 🏆 Best — nuanced, consistent, catches tone Good Good Decent
Coding / debugging 🏆 Excellent — great explanations 🏆 Excellent — strong reasoning Good 🏆 Best value for coding at scale
Document analysis Excellent Good 🏆 Best — 2M token context Limited by context window
Image / vision tasks Good 🏆 Best Excellent ⚠ Not supported
High-volume API use Moderate cost Moderate cost Flash = cheap 🏆 Cheapest
Safety / content policy 🏆 Most conservative — safest for consumer apps Moderate Moderate More permissive — check for your use case
🔌 Integrations & Access
API availability Anthropic API, AWS Bedrock, GCP Vertex OpenAI API, Azure OpenAI Google AI Studio, GCP Vertex DeepSeek API, compatible endpoints
MCP / tool use 🏆 Native MCP support ✓ Strong function calling ✓ Good Basic tool use
Fine-tuning available No (as of 2026) ✓ GPT-4o mini ✓ Flash No official fine-tuning
Tell me your use case.
I'll recommend the best model.
Quick picks
The TL;DR
✍️
Best for writing & nuance
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Consistently produces the most natural, nuanced writing. Doesn't hallucinate citations. Best for customer-facing content and brand voice work.
🖼️
Best for vision & multimodal
GPT-4o
No other model matches GPT-4o's vision capabilities. Best for analyzing images, charts, screenshots, and mixed-media inputs.
📚
Best for long documents
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2 million token context window is in a class of its own. If you need to ingest entire codebases or 500-page PDFs, Gemini is your only real option.
💰
Best price-to-performance
DeepSeek V3
If you're running large-scale API operations and cost is a constraint, DeepSeek V3 delivers impressive quality at a fraction of the price of competitors.